Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1911Hits:19315293Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID180464
Title ProperPower Contention and International Insecurity
Other Title Informationa Thucydides Trap in China–US Financial Relations?
LanguageENG
AuthorZhang, Falin
Summary / Abstract (Note)The China–US financial contention or confrontation comes to the fore, given the pivotal role of finance in the international system and the current international order transition. Will there be destructive conflicts or a Thucydides Trap in China–US financial relations? By adopting a power analysis framework, the China–US financial contention is observed from four types of international financial power: structural, relational, institutional and ideational. The competition for these powers results in reform divergence of global financial governance and thus international financial insecurity. The contention and consequent insecurity, however, do not necessarily mean an inevitable ‘Thucydides Trap’ in China–US financial relations. Elaborated and issue-specific ways of management could alleviate the contention, including shunning RMB-USD strategic confrontation, refraining from a debt weapon and aggressive imbalance adjustment, enhancing the legitimacy of international financial institutions and avoiding a new Cold War.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Contemporary China Vol. 30, No.131; Sep 2021: p.751-768
Journal SourceJournal of Contemporary China Vol: 30 No 131
Key WordsThucydides Trap ;  Power Contention ;  International Insecurity ;  China–US Financial Relations


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text