Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1573Hits:18403819Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID181338
Title ProperBhutanese or Nepali?the Politics of Ethnonym Ambiguity
LanguageENG
AuthorNelson, Andrew ;  Stam, Kathryn
Summary / Abstract (Note)For the group of Nepali-speaking refugees who fled Bhutan in the early 1990s, there exists no consensus ethnonym, but rather multiple terms—‘Nepali’, ‘Bhutanese’ and ‘Lhotshampa’. Based on a mixed methods approach, this article addresses the politics of ethnonym ambiguity by contextualising current naming practices within the group’s legacy of displacement as migrants in Bhutan and refugees in Nepal. In resettlement in the United States, refugees translate this legacy into strategic identification with both Bhutan and Nepal as a form of negotiation with new contexts of ambiguity conditioned by the politics of ‘deserving-ness’, racialisation and diaspora.
`In' analytical NoteSouth Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies Vol. 44, No.4; Aug 2021: p.772-789
Journal SourceSouth Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies Vol: 44 No 4
Key WordsRefugees ;  Bhutan ;  Nepal ;  Diaspora ;  Resettlement ;  Displacement ;  Ethnonyms


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text