| ID | 181542 |
| Title Proper | Representation, bicameralism, political equality, and sortition |
| Other Title Information | reconstituting the second chamber as a randomly selected assembly |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Abizadeh, Arash ; Arash Abizadeh |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The two traditional justifications for bicameralism are that a second legislative chamber serves a legislative-review function (enhancing the quality of legislation) and a balancing function (checking concentrated power and protecting minorities). I furnish here a third justification for bicameralism, with one elected chamber and the second selected by lot, as an institutional compromise between contradictory imperatives facing representative democracy: elections are a mechanism of people’s political agency and of accountability, but run counter to political equality and impartiality, and are insufficient for satisfactory responsiveness; sortition is a mechanism for equality and impartiality, and of enhancing responsiveness, but not of people’s political agency or of holding representatives accountable. Whereas the two traditional justifications initially grew out of anti-egalitarian premises (about the need for elite wisdom and to protect the elite few against the many), the justification advanced here is grounded in egalitarian premises about the need to protect state institutions from capture by the powerful few and to treat all subjects as political equals. Reflecting the “political” turn in political theory, I embed this general argument within the institutional context of Canadian parliamentary federalism, arguing that Canada’s Senate ought to be reconstituted as a randomly selected citizen assembly. |
| `In' analytical Note | Perspectives on Politics Vol. 19, No.3; Sep 2021: p.791 - 806 |
| Journal Source | Perspectives on Politics 2021-09 19, 3 |
| Key Words | Political Equality ; Bicameralism |