Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:349Hits:19890987Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID181548
Title ProperSurvivorship Bias in Comparative Politics
Other Title InformationEndogenous Sovereignty and the Resource Curse
LanguageENG
AuthorSmith, Benjamin ;  Waldner, David
Summary / Abstract (Note)Cross-national statistical research based on “all country” data sets involves no deliberate selection and hence ignores the potential for endogenous selection bias. We show that these designs are prone to selection bias if existing units are subject to differential survival rates induced, in part, by treatment. Using rudimentary graph theory, we present survivorship bias as a form of collider bias, which is related to but distinct from selection on the dependent variable. Because collider bias is always relative to a specific causal model, we present a causal model of post-colonial sovereignty on the Arabian Peninsula, show that it implies survivorship bias in the form of false positives with respect to the political resource curse, and provide historical evidence confirming that the model correctly depicts the creation of sovereign countries on the Arabian Peninsula but not elsewhere. When we correct for endogenous selection bias, the effect of oil on autocratic survival is shown to be negligible. The study motivates the need to think more broadly about the nature of the data-generating process when making causal inferences with observational data and to construct statistical models that are sensitive to treatment heterogeneity and rooted in context-specific knowledge and qualitative inferences.
`In' analytical NotePerspectives on Politics Vol. 19, No.3; Sep 2021: p.890 - 905
Journal SourcePerspectives on Politics 2021-09 19, 3