Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:510Hits:19967160Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID181639
Title ProperOSCE mediation strategies in Eastern Ukraine and Nagorno-Karabakh
Other Title Informationa comparative analysis
LanguageENG
AuthorGawrich, Andrea ;  Guliyev, Farid
Summary / Abstract (Note)Even though the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) has performed mediation efforts in Eurasian secessionist conflicts, its role has been neglected by mainstream international relations (IR) and conflict mediation literature. To fill in this gap, this article examines OSCE mediation strategies in two major secessionist conflicts: the Nagorno-Karabakh (NK) conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan and the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Drawing on Zartman’s conceptual framework, this study posits that OSCE mediation strategies were constrained given its weak organisational capacity, lack of legal empowerment and adverse geopolitical environment. Due to these structural limitations, the OSCE can be said to have been more effective in containing conflict than contributing to conflict resolution. This article aims to contribute to conflict mediation research by highlighting the importance of context for understanding the role of international organisations (IOs) as mediators.
`In' analytical NoteEuropean Security Vol. 30, No.4; Dec 2021: p.569-588
Journal SourceEuropean Security Vol: 30 No 4
Key WordsOSCE ;  International Organisations ;  Eastern Europe ;  South Caucasus ;  Mediation ;  Secessionist Conflicts


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text