| ID | 181643 |
| Title Proper | Arctic security dilemma |
| Other Title Information | assessing and mitigating the risk of unintended armed conflict in the High North |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Wither, James Kenneth |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | After the Cold War, international relations in the Arctic were characterised by cooperation and diplomacy. However, since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014, largely peaceful relations in the High North have been endangered by growing military competition between Russia and Western Arctic powers. The lack of military to military dialogue between Russia and the West has exacerbated the situation. Consequently, an Arctic security dilemma has arisen, which threatens stability and increases the danger of unintended armed conflict resulting from accidents or misunderstandings. Security dilemmas are as old as international politics. They occur when states feel threatened by the expanding military capabilities of their neighbours even if there is no deliberate hostile intent. This article will examine the developing Arctic security dilemma and the chances of its mitigation. Two recent developments provide potential grounds for optimism. The new United States’ administration has pledged to return America to global engagement and multilateralism. In 2021, the Russian Federation is scheduled to become chair of the Arctic Council and the Arctic Coastguard Forum, the main intergovernmental institutions in the region. These events provide an opportunity to rebuild greater trust and confidence in relations between Russia and its Arctic neighbours and alleviate dangerous tensions. |
| `In' analytical Note | European Security Vol. 30, No.4; Dec 2021: p.649-666 |
| Journal Source | European Security Vol: 30 No 4 |
| Key Words | NATO ; Security Dilemma ; Russian Federation ; Nordic States ; Arctic Security |