| ID | 182639 |
| Title Proper | Friends with (some) benefits |
| Other Title Information | how non-allied Sweden and Finland view long-range conventional precision strike |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Salonius-Pasternak, Charly |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Long-range conventional precision strike (LRS) has become a capability that even small, non-allied, but militarily advanced states such as Finland and Sweden can develop. The reasons for developing LRS are myriad, and, while they help solve some tactical and operational challenges brought on by developments in military technology, the capability also has implications for security policy and deterrence. In Finland’s case, LRS contributes to its national deterrence-by-denial approach and enables it to hold military targets deep in adversary territory at risk. An understanding of why Sweden—not a NATO member but equally concerned with capabilities developed by Russia—is only now developing LRS provides some insight into how LRS can contribute to a small state’s defense capabilities and deterrence. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 27, No.1-3; Feb-Jun 2020: p.61-79 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation Review Vol: 27 No 1-3 |
| Key Words | NATO ; Deterrence ; Russia ; Europe ; Sweden ; finland ; Defense Cooperation ; Escalation Management ; Long-Range Precision Strike |