Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1237Hits:18784887Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID182806
Title ProperAre more children better than one? evidence from a lab experiment of decision making
LanguageENG
AuthorLi, Xun ;  Qiu, Yu
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper examines the impacts of siblings on people's social preference, risk attitude and time preference with a data set from a large-scale lab experiment. Employing the variation of fine rates under One-Child Policy for excess birth in different regions as instrument to address the endogeneity of whether having siblings, we find that sibling's role mainly focuses on shaping people's social preference that subjects with siblings demand less as responders in ultimatum game and behave more cooperatively in sequential prisoner's dilemma. This conclusion survives through several robustness checks. Our further result suggests that more sibling interactions and less parental expectations are two potential mechanisms through which siblings play a role in making people more prosocial. Our findings point to a positive externality along with Two-Child Policy which is widely neglected in both policy evaluation and relevant theory such as quantity-quality theory, and provide implications for the fertility policy such as the recent Three-Child Policy in China and beyond.
`In' analytical NoteChina Economic Review Vol. 69, Oct 2021: p.101653
Journal SourceChina Economic Review 2021-09 69, 69
Key WordsSibling ;  Risk Attitude ;  One-Child Policy ;  Two-Child Policy ;  Social Preference ;  Time Preference