| ID | 182964 |
| Title Proper | Synthetic-biology challenges for biosecurity |
| Other Title Information | examples from iGEM |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Millett, Piers |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Although synthetic biology and biological engineering are often portrayed as emerging disciplines, there is over a decade of experience in their interactions with biosecurity. The International Genetically Engineered Machine competition (iGEM) brings together nearly 6000 students on multidisciplinary teams to engineer biology following synthetic biology’s “design, build, test, and learn” cycle. During its fifteen-year existence, iGEM has been affected by biosecurity and in turn has affected it. This article describes four specific case studies at iGEM, highlighting their implications for biosecurity, and proposes ways to improve relevant biosecurity procedures and practices. It showcases how embracing engineering approaches and principles can help to structure efforts to strengthen biosecurity. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 27, No.4-6; Jul-Dec 2020: p.443-458 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation Review Vol: 27 No 4-6 |
| Key Words | Export controls ; Education ; Biosecurity ; Dual Use ; Australia Group ; Synthetic Biology |