Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1383Hits:19823601Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID183021
Title ProperBlinding the Elephant
Other Title InformationCombat, Information, and Rebel Violence
LanguageENG
AuthorHoltermann, Helge
Summary / Abstract (Note)How does combat affect insurgent violence against civilians? Existing studies emphasize the role of combat outcomes, but have not explored the direct effects of various combat events. This article argues that one such event, government attacks on the rebels, has a positive effect on insurgent violence that stems from the logic of guerrilla warfare. In guerrilla wars, government forces tend to rely on informants in finding the insurgents. Their attacks therefore often evince civilian denunciation. To deter future denunciations, the rebels have incentives to subsequently punish the suspected or known denunciator. This argument is probed using detailed original data from Nepal’s Maoist insurgency. A panel analysis shows that government attacks were positively associated with rebel violence against civilians, and especially with violence against suspected informants. Process-tracing evidence further supports the argument, suggesting that the rebels used violence strategically to prevent information leaks and government attacks.
`In' analytical NoteTerrorism and Political Violence Vol. 33, No.5-8; Jul-Dec 2021: p.1469-1491
Journal SourceTerrorism and Political Violence Vol: 33 No 5-8
Key WordsViolence ;  Insurgency ;  Civilian Victimization ;  Civil War


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text