Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:764Hits:20006203Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID183146
Title ProperPolitics or Performance? Leadership Accountability in UN Peacekeeping
LanguageENG
AuthorOksamytna, Kseniya ;  Bove, Vincenzo ;  Lundgren, Magnus
Summary / Abstract (Note)International organizations face a trade-off between the need to replace poorly performing leaders and the imperative of preserving the loyalty of influential or pivotal member states. This performance-politics dilemma is particularly acute in UN peacekeeping. Leaders of peacekeeping operations are responsible for ensuring that peacekeepers implement mandates, maintain discipline, and stay safe. Yet, if leaders fail to do so, is the UN Secretariat able and willing to replace them? We investigate newly collected data on the tenure of 238 civilian and military leaders in thirty-eight peacekeeping operations, 1978 to 2017. We find that the tenures of civilian leaders are insensitive to performance, but that military leaders in poorly performing missions are more likely to be replaced. We also find evidence that political considerations complicate the UN’s efforts at accountability. Holding mission performance constant, military leaders from countries that are powerful or contribute large numbers of troops stay longer in post.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 66, No.1; Jan 2022: p.32-60
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 66 No 1
Key WordsInternational Organization ;  International Peacekeeping ;  Accountability ;  Political Survival


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text