Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:456Hits:19941948Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID183611
Title ProperFriends with benefits
Other Title InformationHow income and peer diffusion combine to create an inequality “trap” in the uptake of low-carbon technologies
LanguageENG
AuthorStewart, Fraser
Summary / Abstract (Note)What drives inequalities in the uptake of low-carbon energy technologies? Research has shown that people on higher incomes are significantly more likely to access and benefit from policies designed to boost uptake of clean energy technologies than those with lower incomes, revealing a pervasive inequality issue. Yet little is known about how these inequalities evolve or interact with factors beyond income alone, understanding of which is crucial to designing policies which do not simply replicate or exacerbate existing inequalities going forward. This paper thus advances the novel “feed-in-tariff trap” theory, which posits that, rather than income alone, peer diffusion and socioeconomic factors compound to widen inequalities in the uptake of low-carbon technologies over time. Using a combination of mixed effects and piecewise structural equation modelling, this theory is tested on the adoption of 21,206 household-level wind and solar PV installations across 6976 micro-level data-zones in Scotland between 2009 and 2020 under the UK government feed-in-tariff. It finds crucially that: (1) household solar PV and wind are adopted consistently in higher-income areas, (2) peer diffusion is strongest in higher income areas with high early adoption rates, and (3) socioeconomic conditions are extremely temporally stubborn. Combined, this trifecta creates an inequality “trap”, locking the benefits of low-carbon technology subsidies into the same higher income areas and widening the gap in uptake between more affluent and deprived communities as a result. Recommendations are given on how best to address this, with implications for anyone concerned with a “just” transition going forward.
`In' analytical NoteEnergy Policy Vol. 163; Apr 2022: p.112832
Journal SourceEnergy Policy 2022-04 163
Key WordsInequality ;  Wind ;  Solar PV ;  Feed-in-tariff ;  Peer Diffusion