| ID | 183706 |
| Title Proper | Pushing resistance theory in IR beyond ‘opposition |
| Other Title Information | the constructive resistance of the #MeToo movement in Japan |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lilja, Mona |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article aims to specifically contribute to debates concerning dissent within the scholarship of International Relations (IR), through elaborating the constructive qualities of resistance. Composite and fruitful stories concerning resistance against power have flourished in studies of the ‘global’. Still, there has been a trend in IR to embrace resistance as a sense of opposition and it has been primarily described in terms of, ‘“counter”, “contradict”, “social change”, “reject”, “challenge”, ‘opposition”, “subversive”, and “damage and/or disrupt”’.1 This article adds to the literature on resistance's productive dimensions by drawing upon the case of the #MeToo campaign in Japan. The #MeToo movement in Japan should not only be viewed as a ‘non-cooperative’ form of resistance – that is, resistance that breaks norms, rules, laws, regulations and order, typically in public and in confrontative ways; rather, the #MeToo movement should be regarded as a ‘constructive’ form of resistance, which produced new resistance figures, movements, narratives as well as established new expressions of resistance. It may be perceived as a contagious form of resistance, which operated through reiterations, doublings, and re-experiences. The campaign provides a significant example of how discourses move transnationally through the force of repetition. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 48, No.1; Jan 2022: p.149 - 170 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol: 48 No 1 |
| Key Words | Japan ; Resistance ; Gender ; International Relations ; #MeToo ; Constructive Resistance |