| ID | 183727 |
| Title Proper | Strategic ignorance and the legitimation of remote warfare |
| Other Title Information | the Hawija bombardments |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Stel, Nora ; Gould, Lauren |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | How must we understand and conceptualize the rationales and repercussions of remote warfare? This article contributes to scholarship on the ontology of remote war by analysing how Dutch officials engage with responsibility for the bombardment of an Islamic State weapons factory in Hawija, Iraq in 2015 under Operation Inherent Resolve. It observes that the main feature of Dutch officials’ accounts of Hawija is their diverse claims to not knowing about civilian casualties. Official narratives shifted from denial to secrecy to strategic ignorance. Bridging work on secrecy from the field of critical security studies with work on strategic ‘unknowing’ from ignorance studies, we propose a new take on the Foucauldian notion of ‘regimes of truth’. The regimes of truth that emerge to justify shifts to remote warfare – that it is riskless, precise and caring for civilian others – rely not merely on secrecy and denial but on feigned and imposed ignorance about casualties. Whereas denial can be disproven and secrecy has an expiration date, ignorance is more elusive and open-ended and hence politically convenient in different ways. Deliberate unknowing does not just postpone investigation and accountability but fundamentally and indefinitely obstructs it and thus sustains the regimes of truth for future remote wars. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Dialogue Vol. 53, No.1; Feb 2022: p.57-74 |
| Journal Source | Security Dialogue Vol: 53 No 1 |
| Key Words | Iraq ; Remote Warfare ; Epistemic Politics ; Hawija ; Ignorance Studies ; Regimes of Truth |