Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:774Hits:20007099Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID183734
Title ProperPresident Clinton's nonintervention in the Rwanda genocide
Other Title Informationan Analysis of U.S. Presidential Foreign Policy Decisions
LanguageENG
AuthorSzandzik, Eric James
Summary / Abstract (Note)This research analyzes Clinton's decision to not intervene in the Rwandan genocide. The methodology used is a historical analysis and interpretation of primary and secondary source material. Clinton admitted that not intervening in the Rwandan genocide was one of the greatest regrets of his presidency. There was not a substantial amount of domestic support for an intervention into Rwanda and Clinton did not attempt to use his influence to change that disposition. Clinton did not attempt to change domestic sentiments due to his priorities of reduced funding for foreign operations and the avoidance of ‘mission creep.’ The most common fault in the current historiography is the claim that Clinton did not intervene in Rwanda because of the failed mission that had recently occurred in Somalia, which does not align with the available evidence. Upon leaving office, he accepted ownership of his poor decisions and expressed sincere regret.
`In' analytical NoteWorld Affairs US Vol. 185, No.1; Spring 2022: p.176-206
Journal SourceWorld Affairs US Vol: 185 No 1
Key WordsSomalia ;  Rwanda Genocide ;  U.S. Foreign Policy ;  Political Issues ;  Security/War


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text