| ID | 184109 |
| Title Proper | Varieties of organised hypocrisy |
| Other Title Information | security privatisation in UN, EU, and NATO crisis management operations |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Bures, Oldrich ; Cusumano, Eugenio |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | International organisations (IOs) have increasingly resorted to private military and security companies (PMSCs) as providers of armed protection, training, intelligence, and logistics. In this article, we argue that IOs, seeking to reconcile conflicting international norms and member states’ growing unwillingness to provide the manpower required for effective crisis management, have decoupled their official policy on and actual use of PMSCs, thereby engaging in organised hypocrisy. Due to its stricter interpretation of norms like the state monopoly of violence, the United Nations (UN) has showcased a more glaring gap between talk and action than the European Union (EU) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which display a more pragmatic, but not entirely consistent, approach to the use of PMSCs. By examining the decoupling between UN, EU, and NATO official contractor support doctrines and operational records, this article advances the debate on both security privatisation and organised hypocrisy. |
| `In' analytical Note | European Security Vol. 31, No.2; Jun 2022: p.159-179 |
| Journal Source | European Security Vol: 31 No 2 |
| Key Words | NATO ; European Union ; United Nations ; Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs) ; Organised Hypocrisy ; Security Privatisation |