| ID | 184133 |
| Title Proper | Denials ‘From Seabed to Space |
| Other Title Information | Assemblages of (In)Security and Denial in the Politics of Security |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Tatevik Mnatsakanyan ; Mnatsakanyan, Tatevik |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Despite critiques of denials broadly underlying Critical International Relations deconstructions of state, security and subjectivity, there is little explicit exploration of the ontological status of denial, and how denials operate in the politics of (in)security. Animated by the question, why and how web of actors and interests traversing the public and private spheres involved in the provision of security endure despite long-running critique, this article problematises = denials. An explicit theorisation of denial needs to be put centre stage in the study of security. Drawing on Dillon’s theorisation of the unstable duality of (in)security and synthesising it with a Deleuze and Guattarian assemblage approach, it theorises denial in two forms – denial of complicity and denial of the impossibility of security – as ontologically necessary for the politics of (in)security; then proposes that we scrutinise and expose assemblages of (in)security. These assemblages form, endure and expand, by thriving on denials of the impossibility of security and its attendant complicities; forming symbioses of denial traversing the public-private realms. Assemblages of (in)security adapt, expand, and propagate new technologies of (in)security, often ironically by responding to demands from critique. Without an assemblage-based thinking, we are methodologically ill-equipped to trace, expose and critique the politics of (in)security, without unwittingly partaking in denials sustaining it. |
| `In' analytical Note | Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 50, No.2; Jan 2022: p.352-378 |
| Journal Source | Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2022-04 50, 2 |
| Key Words | Security ; Denial ; Critique ; Complicity ; Assemblage |