| ID | 184768 |
| Title Proper | Australia the ‘good international citizen’? the limits of a traditional middle power |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Abbondanza, Gabriele |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Australia is often described as a ‘good international citizen’ (GIC), which is intertwined to its status of ‘quintessential’ middle power. However, a number of elements might undermine both notions. This research reviews the concept of GIC and contributes to this niche of IR theory by providing a dedicated definitional framework, which consists of: i) the respect of the international law; ii) multilateralism; iii) the pursuing of humanitarian and idealist objectives; iv) an active support for the rules-based order; and v) a congruous identity matched by consistent domestic policies. After assessing the country’s foreign and domestic policies against this, it finds that Australia has damaged its GIC credentials due to a number of reasons, including: the hard-line policies against seaborne asylum seekers; the participation in missions that are not sanctioned by the UN; the transformation of its global multilateralism into a selective regionalism; the budget cuts to foreign aid; a controversial attitude towards climate change mitigation; and a preference for the US-led global order over a rules-based international society. Far from criticising the country’s foreign policy in its entirety, it argues that in the 21st century Australia behaves as a ‘neutral international citizen’, and a traditional but not ‘quintessential’ middle power. |
| `In' analytical Note | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 75, No.2; Apr 2021: p.178-196 |
| Journal Source | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol: 75 No 2 |
| Key Words | Multilateralism ; Middle Power ; Australian Foreign Policy ; International Law ; Good International Citizen |