| ID | 184968 |
| Title Proper | Contesting liberal peace |
| Other Title Information | Russia's emerging model of conflict management |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lewis, David ; David Lewis |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Russia has begun to promote itself internationally as a mediator of conflict and as a ‘peacemaker’. Russian officials cite its extensive experience in managing numerous post-Soviet conflicts and its more recent experience of intervention in civil wars in Syria, Libya, the Central African Republic (CAR) and Nagorno-Karabakh. Russia considers all these activities forms of ‘peacemaking’, but its approach differs radically from the model of liberal peacebuilding that has dominated international practice in the post-Cold War era. It prioritizes authoritarian stability over justice, human rights and democracy and advocates short-term goals of conflict management over long-term goals of conflict resolution. In this article I explain why Russia's norms of peacemaking and conflict management diverged so markedly from liberal peacebuilding norms. I argue that Russia is no longer simply contesting western norms, but developing its own distinct model of conflict management. This model accepts the use of force as an integral element in peacemaking, engages in ‘coercive’ mediation by authoritative actors, and views the West as a geopolitical and normative opponent. This debate over Russia's approach to peace and conflict also offers wider insights into how Russia challenges the norms and practices that underpin the liberal international order. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 98, No.2; Mar 2022: p.653–673 |
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol: 98 No 2 |
| Key Words | Conflict Management ; Civil Wars ; Syria ; Libya ; Liberal Peace ; Central African Republic ; Russia's Emerging Model |