| ID | 185256 |
| Title Proper | Benefits and Liabilities of Risk-Taking Propensity and Confidence at the U.S. Military Academy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Schaefer, Hillary S ; Farina, Andrew G |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The military environment presents an intersection between a setting featuring unavoidable risk and individual risk-taking propensity; prior work suggests risk-takers have positive and negative outcomes here, and messaging about risk-taking in the military is mixed. The current study used social identity theory to examine how self-reported risk propensity related to three identities/outcomes among cadets at the U.S. Military Academy: attributes of an archetypal “Model Soldier” (physical and military excellence), “Model Student” (grade point average, service positions, and behavior), and Military Values (bravery, duty, and resilience). Structural equation modeling demonstrated that risk-taking was positively related to our Model Soldier and Military Values identities but negatively associated with being a Model Student. Additionally, high-risk-taking cadets were viewed by peers and instructors as confident but prone to judgment, self-discipline, and insight difficulties, suggesting overconfidence among risk-takers. Quantified as a difference between confidence and self-discipline, judgment, and insight, overconfidence mediated the relationship between risk-taking and the three identities, suggesting overconfidence drives both positive and negative associations with risk-taking. Military and leadership implications are presented. |
| `In' analytical Note | Armed Forces and Society Vol. 48, No.2; Apr 2022: p.410-439 |
| Journal Source | Armed Forces and Society Vol: 48 No 2 |
| Key Words | Psychology ; Discipline ; Military Culture ; Professionalism/Leadership |