| ID | 185506 |
| Title Proper | Chinese privilege’ as shortcut in Singapore |
| Other Title Information | a rejoinder |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Chong, Terence ; Goh, Daniel P S |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | We disagree with Humairah Zainal and Walid Jumblatt Abdullah that Chinese privilege exists in Singapore politics and that it is perpetuated by the political hegemony of the long-ruling People’s Action Party (PAP). Consequentially, we disagree that ‘Chinese privilege’ is thus a useful concept for understanding politics in Singapore. Our rejoinder argues that ‘Chinese privilege’ is under-specified and decontextualized by the authors, used uncritically as a shortcut for the consequences of the long-ruling party’s political hegemony for ethnic relations, and is therefore a polarizing distraction to the critical analysis required to advance anti-racism discourse and understanding in Singapore. We show that the authors have mistook incumbent political privilege for Chinese privilege. We argue that ethnic majority and minority Members of Parliament from both governing and opposition parties have had to simultaneously serve as community leaders and transcend ethnic affiliations to represent national interests. |
| `In' analytical Note | Asian Ethnicity Vol. 23, No.3; Jun 2022: p.630-635 |
| Journal Source | Asian Ethinicity Vol: 23 No 3 |
| Key Words | Politics ; Race ; Singapore ; Parliamentarians ; PAP ; Chinese Privilege |