Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1046Hits:19104117Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID185604
Title ProperExplaining Out-Group Bias in Weak States
Other Title InformationReligion and Legibility in the 1891/1892 Russian Famine
LanguageENG
AuthorCharnysh, Volha
Summary / Abstract (Note)Two dominant explanations for ethnic bias in distributional outcomes are electoral incentives and out-group prejudice. This article proposes a novel and complementary explanation for the phenomenon: variation in legibility across ethnic groups. The author argues that states will allocate fewer resources to groups from which they cannot gather accurate information or collect taxes. The argument is supported by original data on state aid from the 1891/1892 famine in the Russian Empire. Qualitative and quantitative analyses show that districts with a larger Muslim population experienced higher famine mortality and received less generous public assistance. The Muslims, historically ruled via religious intermediaries, were less legible to state officials and generated lower fiscal revenues. State officials could not count on the repayment of food loans or collect tax arrears from Muslim communes, so they were more likely to withhold aid. State relief did not vary with the presence of other minorities that were more legible and generated more revenue.
`In' analytical NoteWorld Politics Vol. 74, No.2; Apr 2022: p.205 - 248
Journal SourceWorld Politics Vol: 74 No 2
Key WordsMinorities ;  Governance ;  Muslims ;  Taxation ;  Discrimination ;  Rebellion ;  Autocracy ;  Indirect Rule ;  Russian Empire ;  Legibility ;  Famine Relief ;  Ethnic Favoritism ;  Distributive Politics ;  Fiscal Capacity ;  Ethnic Bias ;  informational capacity


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text