Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:726Hits:20297764Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID185635
Title ProperResettling Afghan and Iraqi interpreters employed by Western armies
Other Title Informationthe Contradictions of the Migration–Security Nexus
LanguageENG
Authorde Jong, Sara
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article develops a novel analytical framework for capturing the multiple, competing configurations that the migration-security nexus invokes in discourse and practice, combining insights from critical migration and security scholarship. The framework’s application is illustrated with an empirical case study of the protection and relocation of Afghan and Iraqi former local interpreters and other locally employed civilians working for Western armies. The analysis demonstrates that locally employed civilians (LECs) are simultaneously considered security actors in the East and security risks in the West, the ‘best and brightest’ causing brain drain and potential terrorists when crossing borders, both ‘model migrants’ and threats to western values. By uncovering the nexus’s multiple configurations and its contradictions, the framework supports the project of denaturalizing the migration-security nexus, while also showing that the discourses and practices justified through its various configurations include the legitimation of border violence and the denial of protection to migrants.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Dialogue Vol. 53, No.3; Jun 2022: p.220-237
Journal SourceSecurity Dialogue Vol: 53 No 3
Key WordsMigration ;  Refugees ;  Iraq ;  Afghanistan ;  Critical Security Studies ;  Interpreters


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text