| ID | 185806 |
| Title Proper | Political sociology of empire |
| Other Title Information | Mughal historians on the making of Mughal paramountcy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gagan D. S. Sood ; Sood, Gagan D. S |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In this article, Mughal understandings of their own past are reconstructed from the standpoint of Mughal paramountcy in around 1700. That was the moment of the empire's greatest territorial reach, when it knew no peer nor threat. To reconstruct contemporary understandings of how this situation came about, histories of the Mughal empire composed by governing officials of the time are analysed using a novel approach rooted in a particular distinction between constants and contingencies. These understandings allow us to recapture the political sociology of empire as apprehended by the Mughal elites. The article's findings are of value for two reasons. Narrowly construed, they help fill a lacuna in mainstream views on Mughal historiography, traditionally dominated by Akbar and his reign, and imbued with the logic of decline (and of its corollary, the transition to colonialism). More broadly, because of the weight accorded to knowledge of the past in the formation of Mughal ruling elites, the findings provide fresh insights into the cognitive framework within which these elites operated at a moment recognized as highly significant then, and in retrospect. |
| `In' analytical Note | Modern Asian Studies Vol. 56, No.4; Jul 2022: p.1253 - 1294 |
| Journal Source | Modern Asian Studies 2022-08 56, 4 |
| Key Words | Political Sociology ; Mughal Empire ; Mughal Historiography ; elite loyalty ; imperial unity ; Indo-Persian historiography ; salṭanat ; mamālik-i maḥrūsah |