| ID | 185832 |
| Title Proper | Casting the atomic canon |
| Other Title Information | (R)evolving nuclear strategy: A reply |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Freedman, Lawrence ; Jeffrey H. Michaels ; Michaels, Jeffrey H. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | We are grateful to Kjølv Egeland, Thomas Fraise, and Hebatalla Taha for their commentary on the four editions of The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. In addition to their critique of the book, their review was intended to offer ‘a looking glass into the broader field of nuclear security studies’. Our reply to their review therefore touches both upon their critique, as well as the more general theme of writing about the history of nuclear strategy. Although we disagree with many of their criticisms, and in some instances believe our work was misrepresented, the reviewers have nevertheless made points that deserve serious consideration by ourselves as well as other scholars working in the field. In this reply, we not only defend our work, but also use this as an opportunity to discuss how to approach the past of nuclear strategy, which in turn can allow us to better appreciate the present and future. In the first half of our reply we discuss the reviewers’ more general criticisms of our approach. In the second half we deal with some specific criticisms. |
| `In' analytical Note | European Journal of International Security Vol. 7, No.3; Aug 2022: p.400 - 410 |
| Journal Source | European Journal of International Security Vol: 7 No 3 |
| Key Words | Nuclear Strategy ; Arms Control ; Disarmament |