| ID | 186078 |
| Title Proper | State responsibility and accountability in UN peacekeeping |
| Other Title Information | the case of the mothers of Srebrenica v. the Netherlands |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Morris, Tamer |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The legal immunity of the UN has focused the peacekeeping literature on individual accountability and the political willingness of States to prosecute their own. UN immunity applies to peacekeeping operations only when the UN is in effective control. When a State is exerting effective control over its contingent, either solely or jointly, the actions of peacekeepers will be attributed to that State. When States are in effective control, they cannot rely on UN immunity for breaches of their obligations. Once a State is exercising effective control, it must warrant that sufficient mechanisms are undertaken to fulfil its obligations under the law, specifically the extra-territorial nature of international human rights law. The Mothers of Srebrenica case highlights that peacekeeping accountability is not limited to the prosecution of individual peacekeepers. Although UN immunity limits specific avenues of legal recourse, it does not prevent victims from seeking accountability from Troop Contributing Countries. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Peacekeeping Vol. 29, No.2; Apr 2022: p.204-234 |
| Journal Source | International Peacekeeping Vol: 29 No 2 |
| Key Words | Peacekeeping ; State Responsibility ; Accountability ; State Immunity ; Organizational Responsibility ; UN Immunity |