| ID | 186091 |
| Title Proper | Command and military effectiveness in rebel and hybrid battlefield coalitions |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Reiter, Dan |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Conventional thinking frames battlefield coalitions as collections of national armies fighting together as multinational coalitions. However, wars also include rebel groups fighting together as coalitions, and rebel groups fighting alongside states in hybrid coalitions. This paper seeks to better understand rebel and hybrid battlefield coalitions, focusing on command and operational military effectiveness. The paper first presents basic ideas about coalition command and military effectiveness from conventional wisdom on multinational coalitions. It then builds on these ideas to explore potential similarities and differences between multinational coalitions on one hand and rebel and hybrid coalitions on the other. In particular, the paper focuses on the nature of different command structures, the varying operational military effectiveness advantages for unified coalition command, and the political motivations for coalition members to resist creating unified command, despite potential effectiveness benefits. The paper concludes by providing policy recommendations to states who lead hybrid coalitions. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 45, No.2; Apr 2022: p.211-233 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol: 45 No 2 |
| Key Words | Insurgency ; Civil Wars ; coalition warfare ; Military Effectiveness ; Command and Control |