| ID | 186096 |
| Title Proper | Revisiting plausible deniability |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Poznansky, Michael |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Despite its prominence as a tool of statecraft, covert action’s defining characteristic – plausible deniability – remains a slippery concept. This article investigates the logics underlying the two main variants. The first ideal-type, the state model, captures efforts by states to disclaim sponsorship of covert operations. The drivers of covert action are primarily international, the sources of exposure are many, and its relationship with democratic norms is harmonious. The second ideal-type, the executive model, describes efforts to shield chief executives from blame. The drivers of covert action are domestic, the sources of exposure are limited, and its relationship with democracy is conflictual. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 45, No.4; Aug 2022: p.511-533 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol: 45 No 4 |
| Key Words | Intelligence ; Covert Action ; Executives ; Transparency ; Secrecy ; Cold War ; Plausible Deniability |