| ID | 186122 |
| Title Proper | Reflection and implication |
| Other Title Information | methodology and theorising |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Eun, Yong-Soo |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article elaborates on the following two questions and their implications. First, how can we as analysts offer compelling explanations for weak states’ agency and behaviours in the current global political and economic environments marked by multiplicity and fluidity? Second, what are the major causal factors that enable or influence weak actors’ agency, and under what conditions is their agency facilitated or constrained? Although an extensive literature in the discipline of International Relations (IR) confirms that today’s world is highly complex and diverse in terms of who or what matters in global politics, the subject of weak states and their agency is still not adequately discussed. Furthermore, the issues of methodology and theorising for the subject remain uncharted territory. By reflecting upon the main arguments and empirical findings of our special issue, this concluding article makes a case for ‘open-ended’ analytic eclecticism as an alternative methodological/analytical scheme, and lays preliminary ground for theorising weak states’ agency in the changed and changing global environments in the twenty-first century. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 35, No.2; Mar 2022: p.368-381 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol: 35 No 2 |
| Key Words | Methodology ; Weak State ; Eclecticism ; Theorisation ; Provisionality ; Varieties of Agency ; Multiplex |