| ID | 186205 |
| Title Proper | Countering hybrid threats |
| Other Title Information | does strategic culture matter? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Wijnja, Kim |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates once again that hybrid threats are increasingly challenging European countries. Although there is international cooperation on the conceptual level, individual countries are responsible for the actual implementation of counter hybrid measures. This article compares the approaches of Finland, Germany and the Netherlands to counter hybrid threats, while taking into consideration their strategic culture. It shows that the countries differ in their approach to counter hybrid threats in terms of their organisation of security and the scope of measures taken to deter adversaries. These differences are mainly rooted in historical, institutional and political processes. The countries are rather similar in detecting hybrid threats and responding to hybrid attacks, which can be explained by the nature of hybrid threats. Consequently, strategic culture is a context that shapes but not ultimately determines how Finland, Germany and the Netherlands counter hybrid threats. The results of this article suggest that our current understanding of strategic culture is insufficient to describe and explain an actor’s security policy in the contemporary security environment. It is recommended that the concept of strategic culture should be revised and has to be examined more broadly by including national security issues and a broad spectrum of instruments of power. |
| `In' analytical Note | Defence Studies Vol. 22, No.1; Mar 2022: p.16-34 |
| Journal Source | Defence Studies Vol: 22 No 1 |
| Key Words | European Security ; Strategic Culture ; Hybrid Warfare ; Security Policies |