| ID | 186332 |
| Title Proper | Introducing the Peacekeeping Mandates (PEMA) Dataset |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lundgren, Magnus ; Smidt, Hannah M ; Salvatore, Jessica Di |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Research on UN peacekeeping operations has established that operations' size and composition affect peacekeeping success. However, we lack systematic data for evaluating whether variation in tasks assigned to UN peacekeeping mandates matters and what explains different configurations of mandated tasks in the first place. Drawing on UN Security Council resolutions that establish, extend, or revise mandates of 27 UN peacekeeping operations in Africa in the 1991–2017 period, the Peacekeeping Mandates (PEMA) dataset fills this gap. It records 41 distinct tasks, ranging from disarmament to reconciliation and electoral support. For each task, the PEMA dataset also distinguishes between three modalities of engagement (monitoring, assisting, and securing) and whether the task is requested or merely encouraged. To illustrate the usefulness of our data, we re-examine Hultman, Kathman, and Shannon’s (2013) analysis of operations’ ability to protect civilians. Our results show that host governments and rebel groups respond differently to civilian protection mandates. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 66, No.4-5; May 2022: p. 924-951 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 66 No 4-5 |
| Key Words | Peacekeeping ; International Organizations ; Civil Wars ; Mandates |