Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:368Hits:20346957Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID186334
Title ProperInternational Investment Disputes, Media Coverage, and Backlash Against International Law
LanguageENG
AuthorStrezhnev, Anton ;  Brutger, Ryan
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper puts forth a theory explaining domestic backlash against international investment law by connecting media coverage—specifically the bias in the news media’s selection of international disputes—to public opinion formation towards international agreements. To test our theory, we examine both the content and effects of the media’s reporting on international disputes, focusing on the increasingly controversial form known as investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). We find that newspaper outlets in both the United States and Canada have a bias in favor of covering disputes filed against their home country as opposed to those filed by home country firms. Using two national survey experiments fielded in the United States and Canada, we further find that the bias in news story selection has a strong negative effect on attitudes towards ISDS and related agreements, especially among highly nationalistic individuals.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 66, No.6; Jul 2022: p.983-1009
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 66 No 6
Key WordsPublic Opinion ;  International Cooperation ;  International Institutions ;  Domestic Politics ;  Backlash ;  ISDS ;  International Law ;  Investor-State Dispute Settlement


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text