Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:516Hits:20851265Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID186725
Title ProperJudicial Transparency as Judicial Centralization
Other Title InformationMass Publicity of Court Decisions in China
LanguageENG
AuthorTang, Yingmao ;  Liu, Zhuang ;  Chen, Lei
Summary / Abstract (Note)The mass publicity of court decisions in China, this article argues, is part of the larger trend of the Chinese judiciary becoming increasingly centralized. The transparency reform enables the Supreme People’s Court to control the information reporting process within the judicial hierarchy and rein in local courts through public scrutiny. Interestingly, local courts responded strategically, making disclosure far poorer than required. Meanwhile, the central government has dispatched more cadres to local courts, and these cadres are associated with more than a 10 percent higher disclosure rate of judicial decisions, suggesting that centralization of personnel is adopted to effectively implement the centralized policy. The transparency reform, coinciding with reforms in other domains, embodies an important shift toward a more centralized judicial sector in China.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Contemporary China Vol. 31, No.137; Sep 2022: p. 726-739
Journal SourceJournal of Contemporary China Vol: 31 No 137
Key WordsJudicial Transparency ;  Judicial Centralization ;  Court Decisions in China


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text