| ID | 186899 |
| Title Proper | Whole-of-government coordination for complex operations |
| Other Title Information | Symbolic politics or coordination failure? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Ekhaugen, Lene |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Whole-of-government coordination has produced meagre results if measured against declared aims. However, an assessment of such coordination efforts should include also unstated aims. Based on an in-depth study of the primary high-level coordination body for Norway’s Afghanistan engagement, this article finds that the body was successful in pursuing symbolic politics. Showcasing was an underlying but non-declared aim of the body in question. These findings are significant because they provide an explanation why governments continue to pursue this kind of coordination efforts despite their apparent lack of success. Improved coordination was achieved mostly in terms of information sharing. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 45, No.5; Oct 2022: p.668-691 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol: 45 No 5 |
| Key Words | Afghanistan ; Norway ; Coordination ; Symbolic Politics ; Comprehensive Approach ; Complex Operations ; Whole-of-Government |