| ID | 187039 |
| Title Proper | Limits and Potentials of UN Mediation |
| Other Title Information | Views from Ripeness Theory |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Iji, Tetsuro |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | What can UN mediators do to bring warring parties to a negotiated settlement? This article – using ripeness theory – focuses on the parties’ incentives to make a policy shift from war to settlement, and mediators’ influence over such incentives. Mediators can influence through utilizing leverage to create incentives by affecting the parties’ perceived relative power, and through applying intangible resources to facilitate incentive creation without affecting perceived relative power. The constraint on UN mediators is their lack of leverage, while their potential lies in their unique repertoire of intangible resources for facilitative influence. A recurrent limitation of UN mediation manifests where state mediators’ manipulative influence is needed to create the parties’ incentives, and UN mediators’ facilitative influence alone is not enough. On the other hand, UN mediatory potential can be utilized where the parties’ incentives are developed through their own actions and often in the face of pressure and leverage from external patrons. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Negotiation Vol. 27, No.3; 2022 : p.354–385 |
| Journal Source | International Negotiation Vol: 27 No 3 |
| Key Words | Power ; Mediation ; Ripeness ; Leverage ; Incentive ; United Nations ; Mutually Enticing Opportunity ; Mutually Hurting Stalemate ; Way Out |