| ID | 187112 |
| Title Proper | Electoral impact of military experience |
| Other Title Information | evidence From U.S. senate elections (1982–2016) |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Richardson, David K |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The belief that a military veteran candidate receives an electoral benefit at the polls based on a history of military service remains a widely held assumption in American politics. However, this assumption of a veteran electoral bonus has rarely been studied by scholars and the limited literature displays mixed results. This article presents the findings of a new study that addresses the mixed results in the literature and presents evidence that demonstrates that certain types of military veteran candidates do gain a veteran bonus in congressional elections. This advantage over nonveterans is conditioned by party, the type of race, and the nature of military service. By analyzing general election races for the United States Senate over 34 years (1982–2016), the study uncovers support for Democratic candidates with military service receiving an electoral bonus at the polls. This electoral bonus is most widely enjoyed by Democratic veterans in open Senate races and with experience in deployed warzones. The key findings suggest that previous conclusions in the literature with respect to establishing a veteran bonus in congressional elections should be reexamined to expand the time period of analysis, restructure the characterization of military experience beyond a binary variable, and include both House and Senate elections. |
| `In' analytical Note | Armed Forces and Society Vol. 48, No.4; Oct 2022: p.961–981 |
| Journal Source | Armed Forces and Society Vol: 48 No 4 |
| Key Words | Political Science ; Representation ; Congressional Elections ; Veterans |