Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:652Hits:19966354Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID187304
Title ProperPersevering with bandwagoning, not hedging
Other Title Informationwhy European security cooperation still conforms to realism
LanguageENG
AuthorCladi, Lorenzo
Summary / Abstract (Note)Over the past few years, European security cooperation has been revived. The EU has launched several defence initiatives and some member states, such as France have launched their own collaborative initiatives. The renewed activism in European security cooperation followed several years of inactivity and warrants theoretical investigation. Hedging is a concept that has been employed to make sense of renewed activism in European security cooperation. By pursuing hedging, Europeans are preparing for a future in which the US might be unwilling or unable to get involved, and to assist with, European security affairs. Advancing a neorealist analysis, this article argues that European states’ efforts to increase cooperation remain consistent with the broader trajectory of European security cooperation since the end of the Cold War. European states remain dependent on the US for their security and are still far from autonomously projecting their influence internationally. This article illustrates the argument with reference to the recent withdrawal of the US from Afghanistan and the French promise to wind down its commitment in the Sahel. The implications of this argument are discussed in detail.
`In' analytical NoteDefence Studies Vol. 22, No.4; Dec 2022: p.624-643
Journal SourceDefence Studies Vol: 22 No 4
Key WordsRealism ;  European Security ;  Bandwagoning


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text