Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:354Hits:19957761Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID187314
Title ProperConceptual Resilience Versus Social Utility in Strategic Thinking
LanguageENG
AuthorMilevski, Lukas
Summary / Abstract (Note)The West produces a lot of strategic thinking, most of it ad hoc responses to present stimuli not only rarely analytically or strategically useful but often damaging existing and useful strategic theory as a consequence. Lukas Milevski applies resilience to strategic theory and contrasts it with its opposite, social utility. Resilience is explained and applied to the particulars of strategic thought. The social utility of ad hoc theory is recognised, notably in attracting attention, which even militaries need to do. The tension between conceptual resilience and social utility should be reflected in strategic education so that the advantages of both are maintained.
`In' analytical NoteRusi Journal Vol. 167, No.2; 2022: p.62-70
Journal SourceRusi Journal Vol: 167 No 2
Key WordsStrategic Thinking ;  Conceptual Resilience Versus Social Utility


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text