Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:417Hits:19940679Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID187373
Title ProperInternational system and the Syrian civil war
LanguageENG
AuthorPhillips, Christopher
Summary / Abstract (Note)How does the international system impact a civil war? Does polarity affect the war’s outbreak, character and how long it lasts? Systemic Realists argue multipolarity makes inter-state war more likely, but is this also true of intra-state war? Using the Syria conflict (2011-present) as a case study, this article suggests a connection can be found. It argues that the end of US-dominated unipolarity, and its interaction with a new multipolarity in the Middle East region impacted the behaviour and calculations of foreign states involved, contributing to the outbreak of war and how it progressed. The same interacting multipolarity paradoxically also shaped Russia’s decision to intervene in 2015, ultimately edging the war towards a conclusion, something that Systemic Realists would not expect. This study of the systemic effects in the Syria conflict suggests that the Neo-Realist concept of polarity continues to have relevance and can be useful in understanding intra- as well as inter-state conflict. It points to the importance of the interaction between regional and global systems in generating these effects, and it suggests a reconsideration of the Neo-Realist view that multipolarity always makes wars harder to end.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Relations Vol. 36, No.3; Sep 2022: p.358-381
Journal SourceInternational Relations Vol: 36 No 3
Key WordsRegionalism ;  Middle East ;  Syria ;  Polarity ;  Civil War ;  Systemic Realism


 
 
Media / Other Links  "Full Text