Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:818Hits:18936144Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID187391
Title ProperCitizens and Peace Mediations in Divided Societies
Other Title Information Identifying Zones of Agreement through a Conjoint Survey Experiment
LanguageENG
AuthorLoizides, Neophytos ;  Psaltis, Charis
Summary / Abstract (Note)How can areas of potential agreement be identified and endorsed by citizens in protracted conflicts? In an effort to answer this question, the article introduces a conjoint experiment across the ethnically and territorially split communities of Cyprus and tests a range of hypotheses about the structure of public opinion with respect to a future settlement. We test hypotheses on security and credible commitments, the legacy of past negotiations, as well as transitional justice mechanisms following United Nations plans to mediate the conflict between Greek and Turkish Cypriots. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we demonstrate that a zone of possible agreement (ZOPA) exists from a public opinion perspective. We specifically explore power-sharing in the context of security, provisions for the internally displaced, federal courts, and territorial readjustments and highlight their relative importance for public opinion interventions across conflict-ridden societies.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 66, No.9; Oct 2022: p.1619-1649
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 66 No 9
Key WordsPeace Agreements ;  Displacement ;  Power-Sharing ;  Federal Courts ;  Conjoint Analysis ;  Integrative (Win-Win) Negotiations ;  Zopa


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text