| ID | 187406 |
| Title Proper | Transparency in the Process of Implementing Article 76 of the UNCLOS |
| Other Title Information | Peering Inside |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | De Herdt, Sandrine W |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The lack of transparency in the work of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf constitutes a major issue for both submitting and third states. In this respect, a careful reader of the reports of UNCLOS Meeting of the States Parties would not fail to discern the constant calls for transparency in the work of this body. While much has already been said on the transparency/confidentiality issues in the work of the Commission, new issues have emerged, such as the question of transparency in the internal relationship between the Commission and its subcommission. Prompted by this observation, this article discusses the process of implementing Article 76 of UNCLOS through the prism of transparency, opacity, and confidentiality, with a particular focus on the instances of disagreements between the subcommission and the Commission in plenary. |
| `In' analytical Note | Ocean Development and International Law Vol. 53, No.2-3; Apr-Sep 2022; p.166-179 |
| Journal Source | Ocean Development and International Law Vol: 53 No 2-3 |
| Key Words | Unclos ; Transparency ; CLCS ; Confidentiality ; Continental Shelf Beyond 200 NM ; Consistency |