| ID | 187419 |
| Title Proper | Why was the Pandemic Poorly Managed by the Government of India? A State-in-Society Approach |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | John Harriss |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Administrative “success” or “failure” during the pandemic are hard to assess given uncertainties both of criteria and of data. But there can be no doubt about the mishandling of the pandemic at crucial junctures by the Indian government, or about the culpability of prime minister Narendra Modi himself. He has this in common with other “strongmen” of contemporary world politics, but Modi was unusually successful in turning the events of the pandemic to reinforce his dominance. The immediate political factors that influenced the Indian response had to do with political leadership and with the “decisionism” that characterised Modi’s actions, but in the context of the pursuit of the goals of Hindu nationalism. This article explains the responses of the Indian government drawing on a framework based on the comparative analysis of Baum and her co-authors. It shows how the events of the pandemic reflect on India’s politics and on the character of the Indian state, using a state-in-society approach suggested by the interlocking arguments of Migdal, Mann and Evans. This highlights and explains the very different responses of the major states of the country. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Affairs Vol. 95, No.4; Dec 2022: p.707-730 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Affairs Vol: 95 No 4 |
| Key Words | Federalism ; Hindu Nationalism ; Strongman ; Decisionism ; Narendra Modi ; Infrastructural Power ; State-Society Synergy |