Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1428Hits:19404028Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID187445
Title ProperArtificial ‘borders
Other Title InformationKashmiri muslim belonging in the aftermath of partition
LanguageENG
AuthorHussain, Shahla
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article focuses on the contested region of Kashmir and investigates how the nation-building project that accompanied the partition of the South Asian subcontinent, along with the creation of the ceasefire line that divided the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan, shaped the question of belonging for the majority of its Muslim inhabitants, especially from the 1940s to the 1960s. It reveals the bureaucratic procedures put in place by the new nation-states, both driven by the question of self-determination pending in the United Nations and devoid of human considerations, made Kashmiris apprehensive about the motivations of both states. The article argues that Kashmiri belonging after partition did not seamlessly merge into the national identities of India or Pakistan. Instead, the anxieties of partition and structural challenges created by the arbitrary ceasefire line shaped Kashmir Muslim perceptions. Drawing from intercepted letters, pamphlets, and biographies, this article reveals the irrelevance of such artificial ‘borders’ in the Kashmiri psyche. In the process, it asserts that the Kashmiri demand for self-determination became intertwined with the desire for the reunification of the old princely state that would promote human-to-human contact, reopen old trade routes, and promote economic self-sufficiency.
`In' analytical NoteAsian Affairs Vol. 53, No.2; Jun 2022: p. 395-415
Journal SourceAsian Affairs Vol: 53 No 2
Key WordsSelf-determination ;  Decolonization ;  Partition ;  United Nations ;  Cease-fire Line


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text