| ID | 187644 |
| Title Proper | How not to sanction |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Drezner, Daniel W |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In the past century economic sanctions have emerged as a prominent ‘off the shelf’ tool of diplomacy. This article examines two of the most high-profile failures in the history of economic sanctions: the United Nations sanctions against Iraq between the two Gulf wars, and the Trump administration's re-imposition of sanctions on Iran beginning in 2018. The technology of economic statecraft changed considerably between these two cases, indicating significant policy learning. In both instances, however, the sanctions imposed crippling costs on the target state without any observable concessions. In neither case was the primary goal achieved, and the negative policy externalities were considerable. An autopsy of these failures reveals three cautionary warnings. First, the recipe for sanctions success is not merely a function of the ability to impose costs on the target state. Second, an underappreciated impediment to the successful use of economic statecraft is a failure to articulate clear and consistent demands. Third, tight linkages between scholars and policy-makers can lead to improved policies in the short term, but long-term political imperatives within great powers can pervert such successes. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 98, No.5; Sep 2022: p.1533–1552 |
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol: 98 No 5 |
| Key Words | Political Economy and Economics |