Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1643Hits:18408113Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID188036
Title ProperBargaining toward Pareto-Efficiency
Other Title InformationRelative Gains, Simultaneity and the Case of South Tyrol
LanguageENG
AuthorCastelli, Emanuele
Summary / Abstract (Note)Building on bargaining theory literature, I outline an original rationalist model that takes in consideration the problem of relative gains to explain why bargaining failures may lead to escalation in an open civil war and when negotiations in civil disputes are more likely to lead to Pareto-efficient solutions. I apply the model to the South Tyrol case, a relatively unknown identity-based dispute that emerged in Italy in the aftermath of the Second World War and was defused before it could produce a real escalation in violence. I show that direct and indirect compensations may help to overcome the problem of issue indivisibility, and that third-party intervention in domestic disputes may work as a functional substitute for simultaneity between the agreement and the enforcement phase.
`In' analytical NoteTerrorism and Political Violence Vol. 34, No.1-4; Jan-Jun 2022: p.385-408
Journal SourceTerrorism and Political Violence Vol: 34 No 1-4
Key WordsBargaining ;  Relative Gains ;  Civil War ;  Pareto-Efficiency ;  Compensations ;  Simultaneity


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text