Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1125Hits:19495441Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID188218
Title ProperJurisdiction of the Dispute Settlement Bodies of the Law of the Sea Convention With Respect to Other Treaties
LanguageENG
AuthorBankes, Nigel
Summary / Abstract (Note)Part XV of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) establishes a system for compulsory and binding dispute resolution. Article 288(2) of UNCLOS allows the dispute resolution system of Part XV to be used by the parties to another international agreement in accordance with the terms of that other agreement, as long as that agreement is related to the purposes of UNCLOS. This article examines the treaty practice under Article 288(2) to assess how those other agreements (which are mostly regional fisheries management organization agreements) provide for access to Part XV. The article examines these agreements within the following analytical framework: (1) Are these agreements related to the purposes of UNCLOS? (2) What jurisdiction, ratione materiae, do the agreements confer on the court or tribunal? (3) How do the agreements provide for submission? (4) How do the agreements deal with applicable law issues? (5) How do the agreements deal with the availability of provisional measures?
`In' analytical NoteOcean Development and International Law Vol. 52, No.4; Jul-Dec 2021: p.346-380
Journal SourceOcean Development and International Law Vol: 52 No 4
Key WordsDispute resolution ;  Law of the Sea Convention ;  Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae ;  Regional fisheries management organization (RFMO) agreements


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text