| ID | 188243 |
| Title Proper | Internationalizing the Kashmir dispute |
| Other Title Information | an analysis of India and Pakistan’s statements at the United Nations General Assembly |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Ahmed, Zahid Shahab ; Jan, Mohammad Waqas |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | No other issue has influenced the India–Pakistan relationship more adversely than the Jammu and Kashmir dispute. To understand the discourse surrounding the dispute, and how it has evolved within the foreign policies of both countries, this research undertakes a critical discourse analysis of both countries’ official statements at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) between 1948 and 2020. The findings of this study are crucial to not only understanding how the two states have been internationalizing the Kashmir dispute but also what lessons can be learned from the past as both countries attempt to slowly reengage with one another. Our analysis points to the fact that both India and Pakistan’s stances on the Kashmir dispute, despite their varying phases throughout the conflict, have essentially remained the same. We argue that, despite seeming to have converged toward some form of resolution during the first decade of the twenty-first century, the current context of India–Pakistan relations presents a worsening trajectory that has not been witnessed since their last major war in 1971. In highlighting the cyclical, almost scripted nature of this debate, this paper attempts to suggest ways to break free from age-old tropes and help pave the way toward more meaningful ways to redefine the issue in light of a radically altered geo-political context. |
| `In' analytical Note | India Review Vol. 21, No.4-5; Jul-Dec 2022: p.546-575 |
| Journal Source | India Review Vol: 21 No 4-5 |
| Key Words | Internationalizing the Kashmir Dispute ; India and Pakistan’s Statements at the United Nations General Assembly |