| ID | 188313 |
| Title Proper | Mercenaries in/and history |
| Other Title Information | the problem of ahistoricism and contextualism in mercenary scholarship |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Riemann, Malte |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The history of the mercenary seems little less than the history of organized warfare itself. From the dawn of recorded history to the recent rise of Private Military Companies, mercenaries appear as a historical constant that allows scholars to make grand historical claims about the organisation of force within world history. This article cautions against this view, arguing instead that the analysis of this actor has been compromised by the failure to adequately historicise and contextualize the concept of the mercenary due to the uncritical acceptance that mercenaries are a trans-historical occurrence. Informed by a historicist contextual approach, I show how two foundational characteristics of the mercenary concept, a Westphalian understanding of ‘foreignness’ and a modern account of ‘self-interest’, were absent in the periods preceding the 18th century. I demonstrate this absence through an analysis of ‘mercenaries’ in Ancient Greece and the Middle Ages, exposing how the problematization of these actors within their own historical context displays a radical difference if compared to our contemporary understanding of the mercenary. In doing so this article raises awareness to the historical specificity of this seemingly universal concept and cautions against the uncritical backward projection of this concept into the past. |
| `In' analytical Note | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 33, No.1-2; Jan-Mar 2022: p.22-47 |
| Journal Source | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol: 33 No 1-2 |
| Key Words | Non-State Actors ; Mercenaries ; Presentism ; Contextualism ; Historicity |