| ID | 188348 |
| Title Proper | Does punishment work? Selection effects in air power theory |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gurantz, Ron |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Air power theory initially proposed that punitive attacks against civilian targets could force enemies to surrender. The current literature, however, has largely concluded that conventional bombing is ineffective as punishment. I argue that this is the result of a selection effect. By focusing only on high-profile bombing campaigns, the theory has drawn its conclusions from cases where punishment is likely to fail. This contrasts with deterrence theory, which has analyzed diplomacy in the shadow of nuclear punishment. Air power theory should follow this model by examining how the threat of bombing has influenced diplomacy and broader patterns of international politics. |
| `In' analytical Note | Comparative Strategy Vol. 41, No.1-6; 2022: p.123-134 |
| Journal Source | Comparative Strategy Vol: 41 No 1-6 |
| Key Words | Air Power Theory |