Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:559Hits:20230257Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID188611
Title ProperPeace by piece
Other Title InformationChina’s policy leadership on peacekeeping fatalities
LanguageENG
AuthorFung, Courtney J
Summary / Abstract (Note)How do states respond to peacekeeper fatalities? Peacekeeper fatalities incur costs for contributing states, leading to recalculations of whether voluntary troop deployments generate benefits. Yet it remains unclear how states with non-democratic regime types respond to peacekeeping troop fatalities, whether the ensuing foreign policy decision rests on tactical decisions to continue troop contributions to the mission, and if states affix the same costs to every peacekeeper fatality regardless of how the fatality occurs. This article builds upon existing studies with a detailed case study of China, a non-Western, non-liberal UN troop contributor. China only recently experienced peacekeeper fatalities by malicious acts, which prompted China to become an emerging policy leader regarding peacekeeper safety and security. China’s policy response highlights discomfort about accepting higher levels of danger as a given for UN peacekeeping, with implications for the debate on the robust use of force and China’s approach to international institutions.
`In' analytical NoteContemporary Security Policy Vol. 43, No.4; Oct 2022: p.572-593
Journal SourceContemporary Security Policy Vol: 43 No 4
Key WordsPeacekeeping ;  Leadership ;  China ;  Combat Troops ;  Peacekeeper Fatalities


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text